SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

LAR1:gu
 

Search: LAR1:gu > (2004) > Dahlöf Björn 1953 > Beevers G. > Losartan benefits o...

Losartan benefits over atenolol in non-smoking hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy: the LIFE study

Reims, H. M. (author)
Oparil, S. (author)
Kjeldsen, S. E. (author)
show more...
Devereux, R. B. (author)
Julius, S. (author)
Brady, W. E. (author)
Fyhrquist, F. (author)
Ibsen, H. (author)
Lindholm, Lars H (author)
Umeå universitet,Allmänmedicin
Omvik, P. (author)
Wedel, H. (author)
Beevers, G. (author)
de Faire, U. (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Kristianson, K. (author)
Karolinska Institutet
Lederballe-Pedersen, O. (author)
Nieminen, M. S. (author)
Dahlöf, Björn, 1953 (author)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Hjärt-kärlinstitutionen,Cardiovascular Institute
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2009-07-08
2004
English.
In: Blood Press. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0803-7051 .- 1651-1999. ; 13:6, s. 376-84
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • We studied the impact of smoking in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study, which showed superiority of losartan over atenolol for reduction of composite risk of cardiovascular death, stroke and myocardial infarction in hypertensives with left ventricular hypertrophy. We compared hazard ratios in 4656 never-smokers, and 3033 previous and 1499 current smokers, adjusting for gender, age, alcohol intake, exercise and race. Composite endpoint rate was higher in previous (28/1000 years), as well as current (39/1000 years) smokers than in never-smokers (21/1000 years). Composite (hazard ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.65-0.94, p < 0.01) and stroke (hazard ratio 0.61, 95% CI 0.47-0.80], p < 0.001) risks were lower with losartan than atenolol in never-smokers, but not significantly in previous smokers. Drug regimens did not differ in current smokers (composite hazard ratio 0.99, stroke hazard ratio 0.94). Smoking-treatment interactions were non-significant, but a borderline significant trend (p = 0.05) suggested decreasing benefit of losartan vs atenolol for stroke prevention from never- to previous to current smoking status. Smoking increased cardiovascular risk markedly in the LIFE study. The benefit of losartan vs atenolol is consistent with the overall conclusion of the LIFE study, although the treatment effect appeared largest in non-smokers.

Keyword

Aged
Analysis of Variance
Atenolol/*therapeutic use
Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology/prevention & control
Cerebrovascular Accident/etiology/prevention & control
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Hypertension/complications/*drug therapy
Hypertrophy
Left Ventricular/complications/*drug therapy
Incidence
Losartan/*therapeutic use
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction/etiology/prevention & control
Regression Analysis
Smoking/*adverse effects
Aged

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view